Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements

v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

Accounting standards define fair value as the exit price, or the amount that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The standards also establish a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy of these inputs is broken down into three levels: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs include (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and (3) inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is most significant to the fair value measurement.

The assets held in connection with our non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan (comprised primarily of mutual funds and equity securities) and the corresponding liability to the participants are measured at fair value on a recurring basis on our consolidated balance sheet using quoted market prices, as are other marketable securities that we hold. The deferred compensation plan assets and other marketable securities are included in the line entitled restricted cash and marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheets. The offsetting liability associated with the deferred compensation plan is adjusted to fair value at the end of each accounting period based on the fair value of the plan assets and reported in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The assets and corresponding liability of our non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan and other marketable securities that we hold are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair values of our interest rate derivatives are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate market data and implied volatilities in such interest rates. While we determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our interest rate derivatives also utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. However, as of December 31, 2012, we assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivatives and determined that these adjustments are not significant. As a result, we determined that our interest rate derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we owned warrants to purchase 50,000 common shares in The KEYW Holding Corporation (“KEYW”) at an exercise price of $9.25 per share. KEYW is an entity supporting the intelligence community's operations and transformation to Cyber Age mission by providing engineering services and integrated platforms that support the intelligence process. We acquired these warrants in March 2010 and began accounting for such warrants as derivatives in November 2010 when KEYW became a publicly-traded company. We compute the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Under that model, the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect as of the valuation date. The expected life is based on the period of time until the expiration of the warrants. Expected volatility is based on an average of the historical volatility of companies in KEYW's industry that we deem to be comparable. Expected dividend yield is based on the dividend yield on KEYW's common shares as of the date of valuation. The warrants are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
In addition to the warrants in KEYW described above, we also owned 1.9 million shares, or approximately 7%, of KEYW's common stock at December 31, 2011 and 3.1 million shares, or approximately 12%, at December 31, 2010. Our investment in these common shares had a fair value of $13.8 million at December 31, 2011 based on the closing price of KEYW's common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on that date and is included in the line entitled "restricted cash and marketable securities" on our consolidated balance sheet. We sold 1.2 million of these shares in 2011, resulting in $2.1 million in gain recognized. We used the equity method of accounting for our investment in the common stock until the resignation of our then Chief Executive Officer from the Board of Directors of KEYW effective July 1, 2011, at which time we began accounting for our investment in KEYW's common stock as a trading marketable equity security to be reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized through earnings. We sold our remaining 1.9 million shares in 2012 for $14.0 million. We recognized revenue from a lease with KEYW in one of our properties of $2.4 million in 2012, $780,000 in 2011 and $668,000 in 2010.

As discussed further in Note 6, our partner in a real estate joint venture has the right to require us to acquire its interest at fair value beginning in March 2020; accordingly, we classify the fair value of our partner’s interest as a redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section of our consolidated balance sheet. We determine the fair value of the interest based on unobservable inputs after considering the assumptions that market participants would make in pricing the interest. We apply a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows allocable to our partner from the properties underlying the joint venture. Estimated cash flows used in such analyses are based on our plans for the properties and our views of market and economic conditions, and consider items such as current and future rental rates, occupancies for the properties and comparable properties and estimated operating and capital expenditures. In determining the fair value of our partner’s interest, we used a discount rate of 15.6%, which factored in risk appropriate to the level of future property development expected to be undertaken by the joint venture; a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate used in determining the fair value would result in a significantly (lower) higher fair value. Given our reliance on the unobservable inputs, the valuations are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 
The tables below set forth our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the hierarchy level of inputs used in measuring their respective fair values under applicable accounting standards (in thousands):
Description
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs(Level 3)
 
Total
December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Marketable securities in deferred compensation plan (1)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mutual funds
 
$
6,275

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,275

Common stocks
 
298

 

 

 
298

Other
 
203

 

 

 
203

Common stock (1)
 
809

 

 

 
809

Warrants to purchase common shares in KEYW (2)
 

 
294

 

 
294

Assets
 
$
7,585

 
$
294

 
$

 
$
7,879

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deferred compensation plan liability (3)
 
$
6,776

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,776

Interest rate derivatives
 

 
6,185

 

 
6,185

Liabilities
 
$
6,776

 
$
6,185

 
$

 
$
12,961

Redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
$

 
$

 
$
10,298

 
$
10,298

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Marketable securities in deferred compensation plan (1)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mutual funds
 
$
5,878

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,878

Common stocks
 
909

 

 

 
909

Other
 
801

 

 

 
801

Common stock (1)
 
13,928

 

 

 
13,928

Interest rate derivative (2)
 

 
716

 
 
 
716

Warrants to purchase common shares in KEYW (2)
 

 
125

 

 
125

Assets
 
$
21,516

 
$
841

 
$

 
$
22,357

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deferred compensation plan liability (3)
 
$
7,588

 
$

 
$

 
$
7,588

Interest rate derivatives
 

 
30,863

 

 
30,863

Liabilities
 
$
7,588

 
$
30,863

 
$

 
$
38,451

Redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
$

 
$

 
$
8,908

 
$
8,908


(1)          Included in the line entitled “restricted cash and marketable securities” on our consolidated balance sheet.
(2)          Included in the line entitled “prepaid expenses and other assets” on our consolidated balance sheet.
(3)          Included in the line entitled “other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, other assets (excluding mortgage loans receivable) and accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.  We estimated the fair values of our mortgage loans receivable as discussed in Note 9 based on the discounted estimated future cash flows of the loans (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximate current market rates for loans with similar maturities and credit quality, and the estimated cash payments include scheduled principal and interest payments.  For our disclosure of debt fair values in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, we estimated the fair value of our exchangeable senior notes based on quoted market prices for publicly-traded debt (categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy) and estimated the fair value of our other debt based on the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made on such debt (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximate current market rates for loans, or groups of loans, with similar maturities and credit quality, and the estimated future payments include scheduled principal and interest payments.  Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be possible and may not be a prudent management decision.
 
For additional fair value information, please refer to Note 9 for mortgage loans receivable, Note 10 for debt and Note 11 for interest rate derivatives.
 
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
 
We recognized impairment losses on certain properties and other assets associated with such properties in 2011 and 2012.  Accordingly, certain properties and related assets were adjusted to fair value.  The table below sets forth the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by us in determining such fair values for the year ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
Impairment
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Losses
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
 
Recognized in
Description
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
2012 (1)
Assets (2):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Properties, net
 
$

 
$

 
$
379,684

 
$
379,684

 
$
62,702


(1) Represents impairment losses, excluding exit costs incurred of $4.2 million in 2012.
(2) Reflects balance sheet classifications of assets at time of fair value measurement, excluding the effect of held for sale classifications.

The table below sets forth quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used for the Level 3 fair value measurements reported above (dollars in thousands):
Description
 
Fair Value on 
Measurement Date
 
Valuation Technique
 
 Unobservable Input
 
Range (Weighted Average)
Properties on which impairment losses were recognized
 
$
379,684

 
Bid for properties indicative of value
 
Indicative bid (1)
 
(1)
 
 
 
 
Contract of sale
 
Contract price (1)
 
(1)
 
 
 
 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
10.0% to 11.0% (10.4%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Terminal capitalization rate
 
8.7% to 10.0% (8.9%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent growth rate
 
3.0% (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expense growth rate
 
3.0% (2)
 
 
 
 
Yield Analysis
 
Yield
 
12% (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent rate
 
$8.50 per square foot (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leasing costs
 
$20.00 per square foot (2)
(1) These fair value measurements were developed by third party sources, subject to our corroboration for reasonableness.
(2) Only one value applied for this unobservable input.

The table below sets forth the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by us in determining such fair values for the year ended December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
Impairment
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Losses
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
 
Recognized in
Description
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
2011
Assets (1):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Properties, net
 
$

 
$

 
$
320,894

 
$
320,894

 
$
150,093

Prepaid and other assets
 

 

 
163

 
163

 
928



(1) Reflects balance sheet classifications of assets at time of fair value measurement, excluding the effect of held for sale classifications.